Related%20passage for Shabbat 150:10

וכל שאינו כשר להצניע:

THESE ARE THE PRIMARY LABOURS. THESE is to reject R. Eleazar's view, who imposes liability on account of a derivative labour [when performed concurrently] with a primary labour.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it is possible to incur more than thirty-nine sin-offerings, whereas the number stated is to exclude this possibility. ');">¹⁶</span> LESS ONE. This is to reject R. Judah's view. For it was taught: R. Judah adds the closing up of the web and the beating of the woof.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In order to even it. ');">¹⁷</span> Said they to him: Closing up of the web is included in stretching the threads, and beating [the woof] is included in weaving. <b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. THEY ALSO STATED ANOTHER GENERAL PRINCIPLE: WHATEVER IS FIT TO PUT AWAY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For later use. ');">¹⁸</span> AND SUCH IS [GENERALLY] PUT AWAY,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is large enough to be put away for later use. ');">¹⁹</span> AND ONE CARRIES IT OUT ON THE SABBATH, HE IS LIABLE TO A SIN-OFFERING ON ITS ACCOUNT. BUT WHATEVER IS NOT FIT TO PUT AWAY AND SUCH IS NOT [GENERALLY] PUT AWAY, AND ONE CARRIES IT OUT ON THE SABBATH, ONLY HE THAT PUT IT AWAY IS LIABLE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he carries it out, since by putting it away he showed that he attaches a value to it. But for others it is of no account; hence if they carry it out there is no liability. ');">²⁰</span> <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. 'WHATEVER IS FIT TO PUT AWAY': What does this exclude? — R. Papa said: It excludes the blood of menstruation. Mar 'Ukba said: It excludes the wood of an Asherah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A tree, or perhaps a post, devoted to idolatry; V. Deut. XVI, 21. It is forbidden to benefit thereof. ');">²¹</span> He who says the blood of menstruation, certainly [excludes] the wood of an Asherah. But he who says the wood of an Asherah; the blood of menstruation, however, is put away for a cat. But the other [argues]: since she would sicken,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It was thought that if an animal consumed blood drawn from any person, that person would lose strength. ');">²²</span> one would not put it away [for that purpose]. R. Jose b. Hanina said: This does not agree with R. Simeon. For if it were as R. Simeon, surely he maintained: All these standards were stated only in respect of those who put away.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. infra Mishnah VIII, 1. Thus a wealthy man is not liable for carrying out something which he personally would not put away, though most people would. But according to our Mishnah general practice is the decisive factor for all, and the exceptions are ignored. ');">²³</span> AND THAT WHICH IS NOT FIT TO PUT AWAY.

Explore related%20passage for Shabbat 150:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.